Skip to content

← Home

Pavlo Hollandskyi

Pavlo Ivanovych Hollandskyi (26 December 1861, Aksai stanitsa, Oblast of the Don Cossack Host — 6 February 1939, Simferopol) — professor of architecture, art historian, historian and archaeologist, restorer, artist and educator, one of the prominent representatives of Crimean culture of the 1920s–1930s. For nearly 20 years (1919–1939) he worked for the benefit of Crimea, saving architectural monuments from destruction and studying the heritage of the peoples of the peninsula.

Overview

Born into a Cossack family (according to family tradition, the surname derives from an ancestor-shipbuilder from Holland in the time of Peter I). He was educated at the Novocherkassk Gymnasium and the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics of Saint Petersburg University, later graduating from the Institute of Civil Engineers (1892). He taught architecture at the Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, became a professor of the Department of Architecture, studied the architectural art of Kievan Rus', and took part in the excavations of the Church of the Tithes, the Golden Gate, and Saint Sophia Cathedral.

During the Ukrainian national liberation struggle of 1919, he found himself in the Crimean town of Balaklava and did not leave the peninsula until the end of his life, despite the opportunity to emigrate. In Crimea he launched extensive activity in the protection of monuments: he worked at the Chersonesus Museum, the Central Museum of Taurida (as custodian and head of the picture gallery), surveyed and documented hundreds of architectural and historical monuments of the peninsula, and developed the form of a scientific passport for a monument. He is considered the first person in Crimea to systematically survey all architectural monuments with full measurements.

Key Details / Subtopics

  • Heritage protection: In 1920–1923 — research fellow at the Chersonesus Museum and member of Krymokhis (Crimean Regional Committee for Museums, 1920–1927); from 1926 — scientific specialist in monument protection under the authorized representative of Holovnauka in Crimea, architect-archaeologist of Krymnarkompros.
  • Restoration and survey expeditions (1923–1928): Vorontsov Palace (Alupka), Khan's Mosque and Karaite kenassas (Yevpatoria), Genoese fortress (Sudak, personal supervision), Bakhchisaray Palace (Falcon Tower, Green Mosque / Yashil-Jami), St. Nicholas Church (Yevpatoria), Surb-Khach Monastery near Staryi Krym.
  • Archaeology: participant in the excavations of the architectural monuments of medieval Solkhat (Staryi Krym) and Scythian Neapolis in Simferopol; insisted on urgent graphic and photographic documentation of monuments when funds for restoration were lacking.
  • Methodological legacy: the manuscript "Guide to the Technical Protection of Monumental Historical Monuments, Their Registration and Documentation" (unpublished); the instruction "Technical Protection of Antiquities and Methods of Their Documentation" was recommended for publication on 26 March 1927.
  • 1927 earthquake: headed the Commission for the Survey of Destructions and the Study of Means for Restoring Destroyed Buildings; published a series of works on seismology (Crimean Earthquake of 1927).
  • Design and teaching: architect of Krymkonservtrust (from 1928) and Krymderzhproekttrust (1931–1938), head of a workshop; projects of fish-canning factories (Feodosia, Simferopol, Balaklava), a canning-industry technical school; headed the Crimean branch of the Union of Soviet Architects; taught at the Crimean University (now V. I. Vernadsky TNU) and the Crimean branch of MITSKB.
  • Persecution: In 1924 he was arrested in the "Moiseiev case" (Sevmuzokhis) on charges of "counter-revolution"; the investigation was closed in 1926 for lack of corpus delicti. In 1936 DAIMK declared his repair of the Bakhchisaray Palace a "crime." He died on 6 February 1939 and was buried in the now-destroyed city cemetery of Simferopol.
  • Artistic legacy: an album of Crimean sketches (1927, 1932) — views of Karasubazar / Bilohirsk, Staryi Krym, Feodosia, Sudak, Chufut-Kale, Yevpatoria, and others; donated to the museum by his wife in 1971.

Controversies and Open Questions

  • Restoration of the Bakhchisaray Palace (1935–1936): due to insufficient funding (100,000 rubles), the repair was incomplete and "hardly touched upon genuine restoration"; DAIMK characterized Hollandskyi's actions as a "crime," although he himself had already warned in 1923 about the emergency condition of the monument and insisted on its documentation. The assessment of his qualifications was called into question post factum.